Due to an absence of resettlement solutions for refugees, the focus of the UNHCR in most refugee camps is on voluntary repatriation. Over recent years, the proportion of asylum seekers applying for onshore protection in Australia who arrived originally by boat has fluctuated significantly in response to shifts in asylum flows and changes in Government policy.
Until , the majority of asylum seekers applying for protection in Australia arrived originally by air with a valid visa and then applied for asylum at a later date while living in the community.
Historically, boat arrivals only made up a small proportion of asylum applicants—estimates vary, but it is likely that between 96 and 99 per cent of asylum applicants arrived by air.
In the proportions of irregular maritime arrival IMA and non-IMA that is air arrival asylum seekers shifted due to a significant increase in boat arrivals. However, in —14 the proportions shifted back and the majority of applications Note: September and December quarter statistics not available.
Although the proportion of asylum seekers arriving by boat has increased significantly in the last few years, and boat arrivals continue to be the focus of much public and political attention, they are in fact more likely to be recognised as refugees than those who have arrived by air. For example, the final protection visa grant rate for asylum seekers from the top country of citizenship for boat arrivals Afghanistan has varied between about 96 and per cent since ; while the final protection visa grant rate for those applying for asylum from one of the top country of citizenship for air arrivals China is usually only around 20 to 30 per cent.
The reason this Whereas the majority of those arriving by boat are refugees, the majority of those arriving by air are not. However, it is interesting to note that in recent years there has been an increase in the number of protection visas granted to non-IMA asylum seekers arriving by air. For example, in —13 the top ten countries of citizenship for non-IMAs granted protection visas included six with high grant rates—Pakistan As mentioned earlier, under current Government policy, asylum seekers attempting to arrive in Australia by boat may be turned around and returned to international waters, or transferred to offshore processing centres.
Presumably the subsequent drop in boat arrival numbers will result in a return to the historical norm whereby the majority of those applying for protection onshore in Australia will have arrived originally by air with a valid visa. In the case of Europe, the figures on irregular migration are not as reliable due to its porous borders.
While unauthorised arrival figures for Australia are more precise owing to our geography, those for Europe are only estimates. We know how many unauthorised arrivals there are in Australia because we are able to monitor unauthorised boat arrivals in Australian waters and all air arrivals at Australian airports. For example, historically in Italy only about 15 per cent of irregular migrants arrive by sea.
The vast majority of asylum seekers arrive in Italy within mixed migratory flows, travelling alongside irregular migrants, including victims of trafficking, through highly dangerous channels managed by smugglers. Whilst some of these arrive by air or by land, some 70 per cent of asylum seekers in Italy are now estimated to arrive by sea.
Unauthorised boat arrivals have always undergone comprehensive security and health checks. In the past, asylum seekers were usually transferred to Christmas Island initially where the following checks were made:. Unauthorised arrivals, regardless of whether they arrive on the mainland or at an excised offshore place, undergo a comprehensive and thorough assessment process, including security checking, to establish if they have a legitimate reason for staying in Australia.
This process includes assessing identities, as many people dispose of all personal papers en route to Australia; assessing whether the person is raising claims which may engage Australia's protection obligations; and obtaining formal police clearances from countries of first asylum in which they have resided for at least 12 months, to confirm they are of good character The department has a comprehensive process for checking the health of unauthorised arrivals.
An initial health assessment is conducted to identify conditions that will require attention. This assessment includes the collection of personal and medical history, a physical examination and formalised mental health screening and assessment.
All unauthorised arrivals can access appropriate health care commensurate with the level of care available to the broader community. A discharge health assessment is completed for each person leaving any immigration detention placement.
This assessment includes the provision of a health discharge summary from the Health Services Manager to the individual, which informs future health providers of relevant health history, treatment received during detention and any ongoing treatment regimes. Where appropriate, linkages are made with relevant community health providers to facilitate ongoing care beyond discharge.
Depending on the individual circumstances, reasons for entering and country of origin, temporary visa applicants may also be required to undergo a health examination. Asylum seekers who arrive by boat are subject to the same assessment criteria as all other asylum applicants.
Past figures show that between 70 and per cent of asylum seekers arriving by boat at different times have been found to be refugees and granted protection either in Australia or in another country. In contrast, asylum claims from people who enter Australia by air on a valid visa and subsequently apply for asylum have not had such high success rates historically and the majority have not been found to be refugees.
This is demonstrated by the lower protection visa grant rates for non-IMAs air arrivals of around 45 per cent annually. In other words, past figures show that more asylum seekers who arrived by boat have been recognised as refugees than those who entered Australia by air.
Historically, successful onshore applicants boat and air arrivals usually only make up a relatively small proportion of the total number of refugees and other humanitarian entrants accepted by Australia each year—usually in the region of 17 to 20 per cent.
For example:. The following material has been reproduced from L Buckmaster and J Guppy, Australian Government assistance to refugees: fact v fiction , Background note, Parliamentary Library, Canberra, This affects their ability to heal psychologically.
The requirement to have claims for Protection reassessed is inefficient, costly and unnecessary. Temporary protection is not compatible with international law. Our Government can choose to reinstate permanent protection visas for everyone who it grants asylum, so people can get on with rebuilding their lives and participate fully in our community. Recommendations TPVs and SHEVs be abolished and the right to apply for a Permanent Protection visa be reinstated as a single statutory Refugee Status Determination process with access to full and independent merits review.
All people owed Protection in Australia be given the right to apply for reunification with members of their family unit. Take action: support permanent protection for people seeking asylum. Take action. Stand with us Join the community to stay informed on breaking news, ways you can take action and stories of refugees and people seeking asylum.
Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form. Sign up for alerts. Thanks for requesting a speaker from the ASRC for your event. We aim to prioritise people with lived experience for public presentations and encourage you or your organisation to provide a fee to cover the costs of providing quality speakers.
Key contact details. Subject presentation: Immigration detention Legal process for seeking asylum Family re-union Right to work and access to education Personal stories of seeking asylum Other Please let us know what issues and outcomes you would like from our presentation. Please specify:. Will there be children attending? Will there be people with a refugee background or people seeking asylum?
Please list any audio-visual equipment e. Migration Regulations , Schedule 2, Subclass , criterion The application form for a Refugee subclass visa states that the requirements for the visa are that the applicant is living outside their home country; and subject to persecution in their home country; and in need of resettlement: DIBP, Application for an Offshore Humanitarian visa Form , DIBP website.
Migration Act , Federal Register of Legislation website. P Dutton, Restoring integrity to refugee intake , media release, 12 May For example, family members of refugees who arrived in Australia by plane, or arrived by boat prior to 13 August , or were granted one of the five offshore refugee visas.
S Morrison, Honouring our promise to provide more resettlement places to offshore humanitarian applicants , media release, 6 March Note that the Government reduced the number of refugees it would resettle in —15 from 7, to 6, but increased the number of SHP places from 4, places to 5, places: S Morrison, Stopping the boats to help Iraqis and Syrians , media release, op.
Family members of boat arrivals who arrived on or after 13 August are currently ineligible to apply. S Morrison, Stopping the boats to help Iraqis and Syrians , op. In —13 only SHP visas were granted due largely to the large numbers of protection visas granted onshore. S Morrison, 20, places for those most in need of protection , media release, 13 May Regulations Note that out of this caseload, five people were granted Partner subclass visas.
S Morrison, Changes to resettlement another blow to people smugglers , media release, 18 November Note that eight of these people were born in Malaysia to Burmese refugees. J Gillard, Transcript of joint press conference , Canberra, 13 October With the exception of the Commonwealth Coat of Arms, and to the extent that copyright subsists in a third party, this publication, its logo and front page design are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.
In essence, you are free to copy and communicate this work in its current form for all non-commercial purposes, as long as you attribute the work to the author and abide by the other licence terms.
The work cannot be adapted or modified in any way. Content from this publication should be attributed in the following way: Author s , Title of publication, Series Name and No, Publisher, Date. To the extent that copyright subsists in third party quotes it remains with the original owner and permission may be required to reuse the material.
Inquiries regarding the licence and any use of the publication are welcome to webmanager aph. This work has been prepared to support the work of the Australian Parliament using information available at the time of production.
The views expressed do not reflect an official position of the Parliamentary Library, nor do they constitute professional legal opinion. Any concerns or complaints should be directed to the Parliamentary Librarian.
Parliamentary Library staff are available to discuss the contents of publications with Senators and Members and their staff.
Australian Parliament House is currently closed to the public. Refugee resettlement to Australia: what are the facts? How does the UN refugee agency decide who should be resettled? Is there a queue? Does Australia only take people from refugee camps? How many refugees does Australia accept for resettlement?
How are visas under the Humanitarian Program distributed? Are all Humanitarian Program visas for refugees? Does Australia increase its intake for specific groups of refugees? Should Australia increase its Humanitarian Program? Do boat arrivals take the places from other refugees?
Can resettled refugees be reunited with family members? In the following two decades, the overwhelming majority of refugees were Eastern Europeans fleeing persecution in Soviet Bloc countries. In the early s, the refugee intake began to diversify. Humanitarian settlement from Chile commenced the following year after a military coup deposed the Allende Government.
Cypriot refugees began arriving after the Turkish invasion of Northern Cyprus in and the war in East Timor brought 2, evacuees to Darwin, marking the beginning of a Timorese refugee diaspora in Australia. The mass flight of Vietnamese refugees into nearby countries prompted an international response to which Australia committed support. By late , the first Vietnamese refugees had been selected by Australia for resettlement from camps in Guam, Hong Kong, Singapore and Malaysia.
Over the next two decades, Australia was to resettle more than , Vietnamese refugees from various Asian countries. Only a small proportion, around , came directly to Australia by boat to seek asylum.
The first to arrive were five Vietnamese refugees who reached Darwin Harbour in a 17 metre fishing vessel. Another 55 boats followed in the ensuing six years. Even in the first few months after the fall of Saigon, the scale of the refugee crisis being created was apparent. In , the committee, in its report, Australia and the Refugee Problem, identified an urgent need for a new approach to refugee settlement.
The Senate committee made 44 recommendations about the development of a new refugee resettlement policy. This report marked the beginning of new thinking which transformed the national refugee program from the humanitarian element of a general migration program to a dedicated and planned humanitarian program supported by a sophisticated system of settlement support. In May , the then Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs, Michael Mackellar, announced a new national refugee policy, including procedures for responding to designated refugee situations, a series of strategies to involve voluntary agencies in resettlement programs and plans to allow the settlement of people in humanitarian need who did not fall within the UNHCR mandate or Refugee Convention definitions.
The late s also saw the establishment of the first Migrant Resource Centre in Melbourne February , a new loan scheme to assist refugees into home ownership March and further expansion of the then Adult Migrant and Refugee Education Program.
In December , the Community Refugee Settlement Scheme commenced, involving community groups in providing newly-arrived refugees with on-arrival accommodation, social support and assistance with finding employment. In the early s, the refugee program expanded to an annual intake of up to 22,, the largest annual intake in 30 years and a level not seen since. Vietnamese refugees settled from camps in Asia made up the bulk of new arrivals, with significant numbers of refugees also from Laos, Cambodia and Eastern Europe and smaller groups of Soviet Jews, Chileans, El Salvadorians, Cubans and members of ethnic minorities from Iraq Assyrians, Armenians and Chaldeans.
The Special Humanitarian Program SHP was established in , providing a settlement option to people who had suffered serious discrimination or human rights abuses, had fled their country of origin and had close ties with Australia. In , the refugee program included Ethiopians, the first significant group of Africans.
Growing awareness of the psychosocial impacts of persecution and conflict led to the establishment in of the first torture and trauma services in Melbourne and Sydney. Similar services were established in other state and territory capitals in subsequent years, leading to the development of a national network of torture and trauma agencies. In , a special visa category within the refugee program was established to facilitate priority resettlement for refugee women at risk and their children.
In the 20 years since then, Australia has resettled 8, refugee women and their children under this program. In , the Special Assistance Category SAC visa was introduced to respond to crises in particular countries, permitting settlement of people in vulnerable circumstances and with connections in Australia. However, the SAC was progressively phased out by the Howard Government, which expressed concern that it had, at least in part, become more of a family reunion program.
Its preference was for humanitarian family reunion to be handled under the SHP, through the split family provisions it introduced from The s and s brought significant changes to the delivery of settlement services, with the shift from migrant hostels to the On Arrival Accommodation program, from the old Grant-in-Aid Program to the Community Settlement Services Scheme and with the replacement of the Community Resettlement Settlement Scheme in by the Integrated Humanitarian Settlement Strategy.
These and later changes in the delivery of settlement services were traced in more detail in our submission for the Refugee and Humanitarian Program. In this decade, we have seen further changes to service provision and significant shifts in the regional composition of the Refugee and Humanitarian Program. A decade ago, half of the program was focused on resettlement from Europe.
The continuing crisis in Iraq and the commencement of large-scale resettlement of Burmese from Thailand and Bhutanese from Nepal have seen the program shift to one evenly divided between Africa, Asia and the Middle East.
According to the best estimates available, was the year in which Australia, since becoming an independent nation, passed the , mark in its intake of refugees and humanitarian entrants.
From Federation in until , no official statistics were kept of refugee settlement. However, research published by the Australian Parliamentary Library estimated that Australia received 20, refugees in this period. From July to June , Australia received , assisted humanitarian arrivals, as well as another 33, unassisted humanitarian arrivals, according to DIAC estimates. Since the modern Refugee and Humanitarian Program began in , Australia has received , offshore refugee and humanitarian entrants and has issued 42, onshore protection visas.
We analysed the questions put to the Department of We acknowledge the traditional owners of the land we work on - the Gadigal people of the Eora nation, and the Wurrundjeri people of the Kulin nation. We pay respects to elders past and present, and acknowledge sovereignty was never ceded.
Facebook Twitter Reddit Pinterest Email. Get the facts Refugees in Australia.
0コメント