In the soviet union what was the opportunity cost

We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.

Necessary Necessary. Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. These cookies ensure basic functionalities and security features of the website, anonymously. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics".

The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary". The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance". It does not store any personal data. Functional Functional. Functional cookies help to perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collect feedbacks, and other third-party features.

Germany in WW2. History of Russia. Study now. See Answer. Best Answer. Study guides. Germany in WW2 20 cards. How did the Axis Forces win World War 1. What is the difference between a Concentration camp and an Extermation camp.

What where the Nazi's. How many people other than Jews were killed in the Holocaust. World War 2 21 cards. Which country did Japan attack in northeastern China.

Who were the supporters of the Spanish government in This country was invaded by japan in the s. When Germany invaded Poland what did its air force attack. World War 2 20 cards. How long did it take Hitler to conquer Poland. Main purpose of the united nations. After the war East Germany was occupied by. How Offered aid to countries threatened by communism in Q: In the soviet union what was the opportunity cost of the emphasis on heavy industry? Write your answer Related questions.

In soviet union what was the opportunity cost of the emphasis on heavy industry? How did the emphasis on heavy industry affect the soviet people? Why might the soviet planners have favored heavy industry over the makers of consumer goods?

Why might soviet economic planners have favored heavy industry over the makers of consumer goods? Why might soviet economic planners have favored heavy industry over the markers of consumer goods? Soviet leader who promoted the growth of heavy industry over consumer goods after world war 2? How did Stalin make the Soviet Union better? In a theoretical economy with only two goods, a choice must be made between how much of each good to produce.

As an economy produces more guns military spending it must reduce its production of butter food , and vice versa. In the chart, the red curve represents all possible choices of production for the economy.

The black dots represent two possible choices of outputs. The point here is that every choice has an opportunity cost; you can get more of something only by giving up something else. Also, you'll notice that the curve is the limit to production. You cannot produce outside the curve unless there is an increase in productivity. Though the curve is meant to show a strict divide between only two options, production for military spending or food, it can also represent spending on military personnel, equipment, and operations versus all nonmilitary spending in an economy.

This can include investments in domestic needs such as healthcare, education, utilities, and other services. The curve charts the tradeoff that occurs within the limits of production in a given economy. Money spent on the development and manufacture of jet fighters cannot be invested in infrastructure repairs such as replacement of aging bridges. If a nation chooses to focus on military buildup, the only way for its domestic production needs to be met is through an overall elevation of production.

Such an increase would allow for nonmilitary products and needs to flourish. However, it also means the size and scope of military production would escalate in turn. Maintaining such elevated production in order to meet both needs can prove to be taxing on an economy. The guns-and-butter curve shows the correlations that link government strategy, investment and production. The constraints of the guns-and-butter curve can be used to illustrate the strain put on Cold War-era nations that focused on military buildup while consumer goods suffered in response.

Sustained pressure to fulfill military needs for defense was a contributing factor in the dissolution of the former Soviet Union, which experienced shortages on food, houses, and other domestic necessities.

Part of the issue was the concerted effort to keep up with defense spending in the United States. In order for the domestic needs of the citizens to be fully met, the Soviet Union needed to escalate its overall production according to the economic model set forth by the guns-and-butter curve.